Traditional elements of journalism were “inform explain and interpret.” The problem with these elements is that through the process of communicating between different classes of people, it tends to lead to becoming a part of the hierarchy. To effectively report, a journalist needs to manage their bias and conflict of interests. We must exist outside of power structures to give a neutral account of everything we witness.
The transition into a modern journalist is far more proactive with the public. “Educate, engage and empower.” The difference between the traditional elements and these are that it’s about the power of knowledge. Using information to bring people together rather than dividing them.
For myself, I am not skeptical about the power of knowledge. More so now than ever in this world of online connectivity, intangible information is often all people have to rely upon.
Given the acknowledged power of this information, my skepticism comes from its intentional manipulation. Issues getting blown out of any sense of proportion or reality. Using perception to shape reality. It is frightening the thought of competing for the public ear if I must adhere to the sometimes limiting or mundane proportions of truth. I would hardly advocate fire with fire, because then we would no longer be journalists.
How can journalists in Canada compete with propaganda machines? You have to put a lot of faith in the public’s desire for solid information. Sometimes I fear people only see the surface value of an issue – how it relates most to them. From that self-serving attitude they extrapolate their assumptions to fit first impressions solidified in their minds. From my experience, it’s a lot more difficult to change a first impression than it is to instil one.
I realize it is a rather jaded opinion, and perhaps merely my own first impression. Regardless, if I am to hold any salt in this profession I’ll have to shuck this understated but somewhat elitist perspective of people. Give them a chance and they just might surprise.